🔄
Intercompany transactions recorded differently on each side
The India subsidiary invoices the US parent for services. The US accountant records it as an expense. The Indian accountant records it as income. Neither checks whether the amounts match at month end — they rarely do. FX rate used on each side is different. The intercompany elimination at consolidation becomes a quarterly scramble.
📋
Transfer pricing documentation missed
Indian entities with international transactions above INR 1 crore must file Form 3CEB — a transfer pricing report signed by a CA. Most small businesses doing India-US structures are unaware of this requirement until an income tax notice arrives. The penalty for non-compliance is 2% of the transaction value.
💱
FX gain/loss not tracked correctly
When the Indian subsidiary receives USD from the US parent and converts to INR, the FX rate at conversion differs from the rate at invoice date. The difference is a realised FX gain or loss that must be recorded in both sets of books — correctly, consistently, and monthly. Most accountants ignore it until year end.
📑
FEMA filings missed
When an Indian company invests in or incorporates a foreign entity, the RBI must be notified via an ODI Form FC. The FLA (Foreign Liabilities and Assets) return must be filed annually by 15 July. Outward remittances above a threshold require Form 15CA/15CB. Each missed filing attracts FEMA penalties that compound over time.
📊
No consolidated view for investors
Investors in a Delaware C-Corp that has an India subsidiary want to see consolidated financials — combined revenue, EBITDA and cash. Two separate P&Ls in different currencies do not answer that question. The consolidated view requires intercompany elimination entries that neither accountant produces automatically.
⚖️
ASC 606 vs Ind AS 115 treatment differs
ASC 606 (US GAAP) and Ind AS 115 (Indian equivalent) are broadly aligned on revenue recognition — but differ in certain areas including variable consideration, contract modifications and principal vs agent distinctions. A firm managing both sides needs to know where the divergence applies and how to report it correctly in each entity's accounts.